Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

Beijing cranks up web censorship in run up to Tiananmen anniversary

posted Thursday, 4 June 2009


ACB wishes offer their humble apologies for the action of the Chinese government in the run up to the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. For the disruption that Beijing has caused to people attempting to go about their lawful business on the internet, for the shameful actions of government officials who are trying to pretend that criticism of the government doesn't exist and that the massacre didn't happen, for the heavy handed actions of the Chinese security forces who believe that it is acceptable to "disappear" people during sensitive anniversaries in order to keep them quite, and for everything other embarrassing thing that Beijing has done of late in relation to this anniversary.

From the pen of San Fransisco chronicle staff writer Verne Kopytoff

China blocks Web sites as anniversary looms

China's government ratcheted up its censorship of the Internet on Tuesday by blocking Twitter, Yahoo's Flickr and Microsoft Hotmail, two days before the 20th anniversary of the military's attack on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square.

The crackdown appears to be part of a broader effort by Beijing authorities to quell dissent during a particularly sensitive time by censoring sites that could be used to share information considered to be subversive.

It also marks the first time that Twitter, the micro-blogging service, has been restricted on a large scale in China. The service is increasingly used by dissidents worldwide to post from the scene of protests, for instance.

Several of the U.S. Internet companies affected had unusually aggressive responses, signaling a change in strategy in how they deal with the Chinese government. In past incidents, they generally took a more diplomatic path, or remained silent in hopes of more easily working out a resolution behind the scenes.
Responses more outspoken

Yahoo said in a statement about its Flickr photo sharing service becoming inaccessible to users in China: "We understand the Chinese government is blocking access to Flickr and other international sites, though the government has not issued any explanation. We believe a broad restriction without a legal basis is inconsistent with the right to freedom of expression."

Kevin Kutz, a Microsoft spokesman, said his company "is committed to helping advance the free flow of information, and is committed to encouraging transparency, due process and rule of law when it comes to Internet governance."

He added that "we are reaching out to the government to understand this decision and find a way to move forward."

In addition to the Hotmail e-mail service, Microsoft's new search engine, Bing, was blocked.
No explanation

Chinese authorities offered no explanation for the blocking. In general, they say they take necessary steps to ensure that Web sites comply with local law, which requires companies and individuals who post information to largely avoid sensitive topics including Tiananmen Square, Taiwan and Tibet.

U.S. and European Web sites are routinely blocked and then sometimes restored to good standing with little public discussion of why. Censorship is often more pervasive around important anniversaries and political events.
Some obstructed earlier

YouTube, the video site owned by Google, has been blocked since March without explanation, according to YouTube. The company also said that its Blogger blogging service has been unavailable in China since mid-May.

Over the years, human rights groups and members of the U.S. Congress have intensely criticized U.S. Internet companies for agreeing to restrictions in China, including censoring search results as Google does. Yahoo, in particular, has been attacked for turning over personal user information to Chinese police that was used to identify dissidents and imprison them.

Last year, Yahoo, Microsoft and Google helped to create the Global Network Initiative, an organization of companies and human rights groups, to counter the unflattering publicity. The group set voluntary guidelines for operating in countries where freedom of speech is limited, including the recommendation that companies take a more aggressive stance by demanding that authorities show a legal justification for censorship.

Twitter, which is not part of the Global Network Initiative, didn't respond to inquiries from The Chronicle. Some of its users in China reported that they could work around the censorship by posting messages through third-party services that feed into Twitter like TweetDeck.

Reporters Without Borders, an advocacy group for free expression, responded to the crackdown on more sites in China by saying, "The Chinese government stops at nothing to silence what happened 20 years ago in Tiananmen Square." The group added that "authorities have opted for censorship at any price rather than accept a debate about this event."

At least ACB can say that they didn't vote for them. Funny thing, but nobody did.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Smokey left...
Thursday, 4 June 2009 1:24 pm :: http://hookahbowl.com

it's a clash of the Titans -- China versus Twitter and Microsoft


2. Rosalind Gann left...
Thursday, 4 June 2009 4:18 pm :: http://www.rozchina.blogspot.com

I find your perspective extremely interesting. At the university where I am teaching this summer, today is just an ordinary day. Nevertheless, something percolates below the surface.

I read your profile. You say you are not an activist. Nevertheless, writing is a kind of activity, and the important thing is not to be silenced.


3. Rosalind Gann left...
Thursday, 4 June 2009 4:19 pm :: http://www.rozchina.blogspot.com

I find your perspective extremely interesting. At the university where I am teaching this summer, today is just an ordinary day. Nevertheless, something percolates below the surface.

I read your profile. You say you are not an activist. Nevertheless, writing is a kind of activity, and the important thing is not to be silenced.


4. Aaranged left...
Thursday, 4 June 2009 10:20 pm :: http://www.seoskeptic.com/

Western-based Internet companies have been complicit in enabling censorship in China for almost all of the 21st century. The latest efforts to block web sites are just the final touch in China's effort to erase the memory of Tiananmen. See: http://www.seoskeptic.com/search-engine-complicity-in-chinese-censorship/


5. ACB left...
Sunday, 7 June 2009 6:26 pm

Aaranged:

ACB is well aware of this and has written several articles about it. For example, did you know that most of the infrastructure that allows Beijing to "poison" URLs was provided by an American company called Cisco Systems. It provided the networking equipment and the training required to do it.

Cisco was called in to a Washington panel and told to account for its actions a years or so back. Cisco's response was, and always has been, that it was "just obeying local law". This put Washington in an impossible situation because of its relationship with the EU. Many countries in the EU require US companies to censor themselves and to censor their customers. The local laws there forbid most active debate over the extermination of Jews during the 20th century, and forbid the trading of ideas and merchandise seen as promoting the Nazi. Washington was therefore unable to censure Cisco for aiding and abetting Chinese censorship without also censuring it and other US companies over their obeyance of similar laws in Europe.

The same law that would punish Cisco for blocking a website titled "Mao was wrong" would also punish Cisco for blocking a website titled 'Hitler was right". While the same law that would punish a eBay for refusing to sell a movie in China praising the Dali Lama would also punish eBay in Germany for refusing to sell a movie praising Adolf Hitler.

don't get ACB wrong, ACB knows full well about Western complicity in China, and knows that it is wrong, it is just that this is a catch 22 situation for Washington. It cannot punish US companies for obeying local laws in China without punishing them for obeying similar laws in Europe.


6. Remo left...
Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:05 pm :: http://cin-ceo.blogspot.com/

yes, blogger is also blocked:( but there are software programs with which we can access through:)