Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

False Flag Fenqing: Menace or Myth?

posted Monday, 16 June 2008
As regular readers will know, if there is one thing that grabs ACB's imagination it is the a creative story about a conspiracy. It doesn't have to be a real conspiracy, or even credible conspiracy. Just so long as its a good story full of twists, turns, and intrigue, because, after all, it is the story that ACB loves above all else.

One recent conspiracy that came to ACB's mind of late is that of the "False Flag Fenqing": Are they real? If so, who are they, what do they want, and how many of them are there? In fact, do they even exist?

Of course, a good place to start might be to explain what a False Flag Fenqing is in the first place. So here is a little background information.

What is a Fenqing?

Fenqing (憤青) is short for Fennu Qingnian (憤怒青年) which literally translates to "Angry Youth".

In times gone the phrase was used to describe somebody whom banged the drum of change a little too loudly because they were fed up with the way that the world around them was going. A youth radical or activist, if you will.

However, today, the term is primarily used to refer to disaffected Chinese youth (mostly male) whom use aggressive nationalism as an outlet for their anger at the world in general, and often their place in it in particular.

Your typical Fenqing believes with a passion that Taiwan and Tibet "are" and "always will be" a part of China, that China's ills are primarily the result of foreign countries (Mostly Japan and the US) purposefully keeping China down, and there are few prices too big to pay for national unity, including those paid in blood (Mostly the blood of those who oppose unity).

They also believe that anything that anything that happens within what they believe are China's borders is an internal affair that foreigners have not right to comment upon. Even if it does involve land reform activists and electric stun batons, or landing craft and Taiwanese beaches.

What does False Flag Mean?

In a general context False Flag means to do something untoward while pretending to be somebody else. An action which is sometime done to conceal your involvement in something murky, or in order to provoke an incident that you can use as an excuse for something that you wish to do, but which would otherwise be politically awkward to do.

A good example from the world of real life-conspiracies is America's much maligned Operation Northwoods: A conspiracy that was planned but never executed, under which American agents were to stage a fake attack on US interests that would be blamed on Cuba. An incident which would then be used as an excuse to launch a military attack on the island. Equally, a good example drawn from the world of the untrue-conspiracy is the belief that the CIA and/or Mossad were the real perpetrators of the the 9/11 attacks, and that they planned them as an enabling act for the invasion of Iraq, and maybe even a future war with Iran.

In this context, however, it's best to think of False Flag as meaning a Double Agent. Somebody pretending to work for one side but, in reality, is working for the other.

Fake Fenqing?

A few years back rumors began to circulate that the Chinese government was employing teams of agents whom would pretend to be Fenqing, and who would scour the Internet looking for likely message board and blogs.

According to the rumors, if they found a site/entry that was both receptive and nationalistic they would seed it with supportive messages acting to encourage it and to support the views of its author, but if they found a site/entry that was critical of Beijing or its official state line on history, society or politics then they would seed it with comments denigrating the site/entry and its author in a nationalist way.

The intent of these agents, these Fake Fenqing, so the rumor went, was to making it appear that there was stronger support for the state line than there in truth was, and to make out that those who did not support the state line were a heavily criticized minority, even if they were not.

They wrote like regular Fenqing and they acted like regular Fenqing, but they in reality were calculating adults in the pay of Beijing rather than angry young men acting on their own misplaced emotions.

At the time this rumor created a few ripples, but when it was later shown to be accurate not to many people were surprised because it was in line with Beijing's other practices the web. Instead of just deleting offending messages, they posted messages of their own.

However, if this latest conspiracy proves to be true (And ACB isn't saying that it will), it would appear that Chinese agents are not the only ones pretending to be Fenqing. Indeed, next time you read a Chinese post that is so aggressively nationalistic that you start to see red (In the Western sense, that is), you might wish to stop and consider whether said post was placed there precisely for that reason, not to mention who posted the post, and for what reason?

False Flag Fenqing?

Now we get down to the real question "What", exactly, "is a False Flag Fenqing?".

Who are They?

To start with, a False Fenqing isn't the same as a Fake Fenqing (see above). While a Fake Fenqing isn't a genuine Fenqing, they at least are on the same side. Both are Chinese, both are nationalistic, and both believe that they are doing what is best for China. Their beliefs might not be well grounded, but they are accurately reflected in their writings on the web.

A False Flag Fenqing, however, is not necessarily Chinese. At least not Mainland Chinese. They might claim to be Mainland but in reality they may be Taiwanese, or overseas-Chinese, or even (like you didn't know this was coming) Chinese-speaking-Japanese. Many more could even be Americans and other foreigners who purposefully write in broken English because they speak no Chinese, and thus could not pass for Chinese any other way.

What Do they Do?

In brief, a False Flag Fenqing does exactly what a real Fenqing would do. They find a likely message board or blog (or even start up their own), and they write with nationalistic a vengeance.
  • They support Beijing's policies to a fault
  • They slavishly follow Beijing's state line on history, society and politics, even when it makes no sense
  • They denigrate anybody who speaks out against any of the above. Constantly demanding "proof", yet accepting none as valid, and constantly dismissing any argument laid against them as being the words of a traitor, an ignorant foreigner, or as being the voice of a lone individual with their own political agenda to play
If Beijing has committed a crime they will either deny it or try to justify. If Beijing has made a mistake they will try to make it look the fault of somebody else, and if you should happen to find a murky spot in Beijing's history that can neither be denied nor excused they will try to find an even murkier spot in another countries history (Usually America or Japan), and then try to make that spot the focus of attention.

When not seeding the web with nationalist commentary False Flag Fenqing will act in support of Real Fenqing. Backing up their web commentary and Supporting them by attempting to put down or discredit those whom would speak to against them.

However, while a Fenqing might spout a heavily nationalistic line and believe it, a False Flag Fenqing is quite different. They don't believe what they write. In fact, they believe quite the opposite.

You see, a False Flag Fenqing are not Chinese nationalists. They are the antipathies of a Chinese nationalist and hate Chinese nationalism with a passion.

Why Do It?

"Why would somebody who hates Chinese nationalists pretend to be one?", you might well ask. Well the answer is simple. False Flag Fenqing have two purposes. To make China look bad in the eyes of foreigners, and to encourage real Fenqing to do the same.

For example, while most real Fenqing might say that China would be prepared to sacrifice the lives of its solider "to prevent Taiwan from ceding from the Mainland", a False Flag Fenqing might go the extra distance and encourage the real Fenqing to start talking about bombing America, or about using American citizens in China as human shields. The do it because they want to encourage other Fenqing to go that extra distance knowing thatit will make them look bad, or because they want foreigners to read their comments and think badly of Chinese because of it.

Put simply, they want to get content onto the internet that will make foreigners angry at China and if they can't get others to put it up, they will put it there themselves.

Another task of a False Flag Fenqing might be to discredit real Fenqing by making them sound ridiculous (Well, more ridiculousness than normal) by using even more laughably flawed logic than a real Fenqing would use, and even more laughable arguments. Take Tiananmen Square, for example. In the West everybody knows roughly what happened at Tiananmen Square. Even if they don't know the actual details they know about "the bit with tanks and the students". Well, a False Flag Fenqing might set out to deny the massacre this in a way that makes them sound like a brainwashed slave to "Red China" whose reading off of a script, or they might deny that the Tiananmen massacre happened "because everybody died in side streets". They might even try to justify the massacre by claiming that the students were on the CIA payroll, or that the dead were soldiers who dressed as civilians in order to flee the mob, but were killed anyway.

Equally, while there are many real messages of hate left by real Fenqing, most are on websites that foreigners never visit, if only because said foreign audience can't speak Chinese. It's therefore much easier for a False Flag Fenqing to simply write their own post of hate, and then to point to it as "evidence" that the Chinese are pounding on the gate with murder in their eyes.

You could search for “Tiananmen Square” on Youtube and come across hundreds of conveniently placed messages from Chinese nationalists denying that it happened, or stating that it was justifiable in the name of stability. But do you really know if they were written by Chinese nationalists, or by foreigners looking to provoke an argument somewhere that they knew other foreigners would come?

The point is, they pretend to be Fenqing in order to make Fenqing look even worse than they already do.

How Many are There?


So how many False Flag Fenqing are there?

Ah, and this is the beauty of a conspiracy, nobody knows. There may be hundreds or there may be thousands, or maybe there are even hundreds of thousands: All tapping away at their keyboards, trying to coax that little extra bit of hate out of the real Fenqing, just to make China look bad.

Of course, since this is a conspiracy, there may even be none at all. Not one. False Flag Fenqing might not exist.

They might be a silly idea dreamed up by a random foreigner out to create mischief.

They could be a scape goat created by real Fenqing who have woken up to the fact that some of their fellow nationalists are making them look like a pack of rabid dogs, and who decided that they best way to explain their vociferous ranting was to paint them as being foreigner pretending to be Chinese.

They might even be the result of people checking up on the IP addresses of poster who claim to be Chinese and finding that they have foreign IP addresses, but not stopping to think that maybe said IP is a proxy server, or that said Chinese might be studying abroad.

It's a conspiracy, just let your mind run riot.

The Truth?

The truth, who know? ACB certainly can't say how many foreigners out there are pretending to be Chinese nationalists.

Firstly, it would be very hard, if not impossible, to get an accurate figure and, finally, it would spoil the fun of the conspiracy to do so.

Whether you believe in the False Flag Fenqing conspiracy is real, or whether you think that it's complete garbage dreamed up by somebody with their own agenda, ACB hopes that reading this entry will at least cause readers to pause for a moment and to give some thought to the person on the other end of the website that they are commenting upon. Who are they? what is their agenda? and are they trying to inform you, to goad you, or to herd you?

ACB also hopes that if nothing else this entry it will draw more people into the wonderful world of the conspiracy. Such as the Cover up-Conspiracy: One of the few times when a complete lack of evidence can be claimed to be evidence in itself.

Enjoy.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. The Xinhua Free Press left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 2:52 am

Chinese online agents use racism and other vile tactics to try to taint those who critique Chinese policies and actions. This helps discredit valid criticism and garner support for Beijing from overseas Chinese communities. Everybody underestimates the importance of and effort devoted to propaganda in China, both domestically and abroad.


2. ACB left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 3:44 am

So, wouldn't it be plausible to say that foreigners might do something similar?


3. 2lovelycake left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 4:01 am

ACB, If you wanna know more about Fenqing, I suggest you to see a website called Fenqing. It's famous.You'd better look over it before you write something. 2lovelycake


4. ACB left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 4:44 am

2lovelycake:

Hate CNN is much more amusing. It attracts a very predictable class of reader.

I could, however question why your very own IP address consistently shows that you are in America? Maybe you are just a Chinese student studying in the West, maybe you use a proxy address to access my website because you are afraid of what Beijing will do to you if they find out that you've been reading my blog, or maybe, just maybe, you're not all that you say that you are.......


5. 2lovelycake left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 5:02 am

I think you should comsider CNN problem from all things. To Chinese people,they boycott CNN this time is true. Not only CNN.They can.cos to us ,CNN is not popular in China. After this , CNN will be much unpopular than before. But to Western people,I'm not sure. But I'm in America for exchange now,CNN is not popular too I think.There are so many channels on TV. But from what I saw,People who boycott CNN is not only Chinese but also American.When we go to San Francisco to see the Olympic Torch relay,I saw many foreignors ware surgical masks which is writen CNN with a big red cross on it. I'm moved by them. ACB,I think it is hard to define a think is amusing or good or bad.To Chinese people I think they used to consider western media more objective and fare,but from this time,I think most of them changed. They will never deeply believe media both in China and Western media anymore.It is a good thing for them to open their mind I think. best wishes. 2lovelycake


6. The Xinhua Free Press left...
Monday, 16 June 2008 8:32 pm

ACB, sure plausible but no one has the infrastructure China does to do so in an organized way (nor the interest). Your article raises a number of great points, but the real story is the other way around. Chinese propaganda is a big industry and its going global.


7. 2lovelycake left...
Tuesday, 17 June 2008 2:19 am

ACB, the wireless I use is belong to my apartment or my school. We don't need to pay for it.Now I'm in my school.Do you know where I am? Haha. reading your passsage is free to me in China.Cos I know your blog from China. China is getting better now. Don't you believe it? maybe you envy us.Haha 2lovelycake


8. ACB left...
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 3:53 am

2lovelycake:

I'm beginning to question whether have ever actually lived in China. Most Chinese people CANNOT boycott CNN because CNN does not broadcast on the Mainland China. You can only receive it with special permission. CNN is not permitted in 99% of the Mainland, the only places where you can get it regularly are in hotels where foreigners stay and in businesses that have foreigners.

I also think that you have a fundimental misunderstanding of foreigners not watching CNN. America is split into three people, the conservatives and neo-conservatives, the moderates, and the liberals.

CNN is a moderate channel, mostly moderates watch it, The liberals consider CNN to be too conservative, they do not watch it and have their own liberal news channels, The conservatives and the neo-conservatives consider CNN to be too liberal and they have channels like Fox (If you think CNN is bad you will HATE Fox. What Fox says about China is 100 times worse than what CNN says).

This is not the same as boycotting.

"It is a good thing for them to open their mind I think"

Maybe you should look closer. They are closing their minds. Instead of thinking that maybe the West TV is not objective and maybe that the China TV is, they instead think that all media lies to them. This is bad.


9. ACB left...
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 3:58 am

The Xinhua Free Press:

Infrastructure. I don't recall suggesting that this is organized, could it not be many people acting on their own? When I said "conspiracy" I didn't mean like a world government conspiracy.

While China might be expanding it's propaganda machine, it's just aping the West which did this several generations ago. My entire life I have lived seeing it, I have never known a time when it was not there. You can get CNN and BBC in a hundred countries spreading the Western view. You get Western films everywhere, even Iran and China show Western films. You may not notice it, but the West is everywhere. Their propoganda may be more subtle, and may masquerade as other things, but at the end of the day it is still there.


10. ACB left...
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 4:18 am

2lovelycake:

Why would I want to guess where you are? It's not as if I'm going to inform on you for reading my own blog, is it? You read this blog, you make it more popular, I benefit regardless of where you are.

If you'd like me to play games though I could suggest that you live somewhere near to Duke University in North Carolina as you're able to pick up their wifi connection. Of course, you could simply be using a proxy server to hide your real IP address. I've done that too as I've often visited website that are banned in China and needed a proxy server in America to be able to see them.

I remember a few years back some people were arrested because they were running a proxy server that allowed Chinese to pretend that they were living in Japan so that they could play online games that only let people with Japanese IP addresses play.

Why would I envy you? I don't have to live in China, or in the West, I can come and go if I choose as I have the passport and the travel papers. I have seen the lifestyle in the West and am not liking much of it. People like the consumerism too much, they buy many things that they do not need, then throw them away when they get bored. The want to be like the movie stars and they forget their own history and disrespect their own culture, and they get angry too quickly. In China people might be poor but they remember who they are and whether they coming from and they are slow to anger.


11. Job left...
Thursday, 19 June 2008 8:40 pm

It's not so much of a puzzle if you know numerous fenqing spouting extreme illogical nonsense in person. Granted, in this situation certainty comes at the cost of geographic specificity (are the youth in -insert other city here- this crazy?) but at the very least it tells me that somewhere a number of fenqing are capable of believing such things and so people saying stuff like that on the internet (where people tend to come across even more extreme, and dumber, than in real life) is not really unlikely.

Or perhaps the conspiracy is even larger than it seems.


12. 2lovelycake left...
Friday, 20 June 2008 6:42 am

ACB, but I'm not good at computer.I never hide my own IP address. I don't understand why you say that. I never hide something to you or to the people around me.I 'm sincere I think . I don't mean that you envy me live in western country.I mean I'm proud of be a Chinese. What you said about the arrest things,I don't know.But if it is true,then it already proved that China is changing better now. Cos I never gain any warns about the internet.We are free to see your blog.China is changing. do you understand me?


13. Sonagi left...
Friday, 20 June 2008 12:30 pm

Interesting post. Government-sponsored internet commenters aren't unique to China, of course. The US is alleged to have used them without success on Arabic-language forums. Likewise, every major forum has its trolls who create a false identity to make other members of that group look bad. That group might be another nationality, ethnicity, or political orientation.

Having read nationalist comments in Chinese and English on a number of forums, I find the false fenqing trolls, that is, posters trying to make Chinese netizens look bad, pretty easy to spot. Some of the English-speaking Fifty Cent Party members are too smooth. They weave current political slang expressions like "Rovian" (former Bush pittbull Karl Rove turned into an adjective) into their posts defending China. They also text-proof their claims with links to policy wonk websites, suggesting that these False Fenqing/Fifty Cent Party are probably are currently enrolled or have graduated from humanities departments in North American colleges and universities. Their posts read like a cut-and-paste of the same talking points that circulate among their number.

<i>CNN is a moderate channel, mostly moderates watch it, The liberals consider CNN to be too conservative, they do not watch it and have their own liberal news channels, The conservatives and the neo-conservatives consider CNN to be too liberal and they have channels like Fox (If you think CNN is bad you will HATE Fox. What Fox says about China is 100 times worse than what CNN says). </i>

Hehehe. Have to agree with you about Fox. I don't consider CNN to be liberal, but I wonder what TV news broadcasters you think appeal to liberals? I don't watch television, so I have no idea. I find the content of CNN's online news disappointingly lacking in depth and breadth. The BBC and even ABC News are much better. ABC will devote 3-4 pages to a story that gets only a page at CNN. MSNBC is good, too. The only advantage to CNN is that it is usually first with international breaking news here in the US.


14. dave zimmerman left...
Saturday, 21 June 2008 2:08 am

I think the idea of non-chinese posing as angry young chinese is on the same level as chinese hackers attacking the american power grid.


15. ACB left...
Saturday, 21 June 2008 7:40 pm

2lovelycake:

"I'm not good at computer"

You don't have to be, Internet Explorer comes pre installed with the ability to hide your IP address. You just type the proxy address in under Internet Options. Anybody can do it. It takes about 5 seconds.

"I don't understand why you say that"

Because it's perfectly normal, many people do it, so why not you?

"I don't mean that you envy me live in western country"

Why would I envy you living in China? I have the passport and the papers, I can choose to live in China or not to live in China. Does it not tell you something that I chose to live on the Mainland? Why would somebody who hates the Mainland choose to live on the Mainland?

"We are free to see your blog."

It's been banned before, it only became visible last year.


16. ACB left...
Saturday, 21 June 2008 7:45 pm

dave zimmerman:

I've been accused of this myself, back during the dark days of Wiettenberg.

Seriously, you've never considered that a Taiwanese might want to badmouth the Mainland while pretending to be a Mainland, or such like?


17. ACB left...
Saturday, 21 June 2008 8:03 pm

Sonagi:

Calling a network liberal is fraught with peril as there are so many different types of people using the word "liberal" to mean so many different things. It all depends on what your own personal views are and on what specifically you are talking about. I say this because networks like Fox are conservative when reporting on social stories and liberal when reporting on finance and the economy. For example, Fox is anti-abortion and anti-regulation, it's conservative on crime, immigration and foreign policy but when it comes to big business it is liberal liberal liberal all the way.

On general grounds, CBS is probably a good example of the liberal media in it's truest sense, however there are some much more aggressively liberal networks. Look for networks that actively support the division of church and state, or which are pro abortion, as well as networks which are anti-big business/oil business.

You probably have never heard of it, but when I was studying in Europe there was a new agency called Independent Television News, it's a British public service broadcasting company who do a lot of international work. I think that they are probably the best news service in the world, they are about 10 times more objective than CNN and the BBC (The BBC is OK, but it heavily self censors itself when it comes to issues such as the British government and the Middle East, as well as contentious conservative issues such as immigration and abortion). Independent Television News do some extremely hard hitting investigative journalism. They don't broadcast in China and would probably be banned if they tried to, but you can get them via the internet. They are the only news source that I really trust for stories on the Middle East and their China coverage is objective. Though they call the Bush administration out so often that Conservatives in the US would hate them with a passion.


18. Sonagi left...
Sunday, 22 June 2008 12:51 am

Will check out Independent Television News, thanks. Always looking for objective, informative news sources.

Agree that CBS is the most liberal of the Big Three and its coverage of the Bush administration the most controversial.

Also it is recognized that liberal and conservative are not linear polar opposites and that one can be either with regard to social issues and economics. In the US, economic/social liberals tend to vote Republican in spite of its stances on abortion, gay marriage, and immigration.

Are there any original content Chinese-language news sources that you like? I'm not referring to Chinese-language versions of the BBC and the like, but news by Chinese speakers for Chinese speakers.


19. Xinhua Free Press left...
Monday, 23 June 2008 7:37 pm

ACB, there's a difference between an organized, biased dissemination of information and a commonality of views. Aggregating a "western" view of the world is silly. BBC or CNN has its own infrastructure, but "the west" does not. In China, propaganda does indeed have an expanding infrastructure, and its not a conspiracy but a government initiative. If China were "aping the west" it would allow the media free reign to criticize and contradict. No one serious suggest that's happening in China right now.


20. Lord of the Fens left...
Wednesday, 30 July 2008 9:53 am

我是愤青大王,Oliver Trollwell, 中国最危险的外国网特。 My secret duty is to stir up nationalist sentiments in Chinese forums, posing as a Chinese lad in Liaoning province. Yes, Dave Zimmerman, there is a small squad of Caucasian clandestine forum agents, 都会说一口非常流利的普通话 (who can all speak extremely fluent Mandarin). Don't worry, China! We have no plans to attack the Beijing Olympic power grid.


21. The Angry Chinese Blogger left...
Thursday, 31 July 2008 5:10 am :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

OK, but mom says not to stay out too late on a school night.


22. Ant left...
Saturday, 9 August 2008 9:38 am :: http://chineseantfarm.blogspot.com/

Fascinating, ACB. My question is how did you catch wind of this conspiracy? Did you yourself deduce that there is a false fenqing movement, or did you read or about it elsewhere first. If the latter, please inform me of the source of this rumor. By the way, a very well done job on this post. I will be back. You may visit my blog, if you like.


23. ACB left...
Saturday, 9 August 2008 4:08 pm

Ant:

The big thing about rumors such as this is that they are near impossible to quantify or to "provide sources" for. You get a lot of chatter and a lot of suspicion on message boards and blogs, or around the water cooler as the Americans would say, and you can show evidence that people "believe that there is a conspiracy", or that people 'claim that there is a conspiracy", simply by posting link after link to the places where these claims are made. Proving it, though, is a different matter all together. For one thing the rumor may be entirely without foundation, and thus you cannot demonstrate that it is true because it is not.

In the short term, even if it does prove to be true, it is near impossible to prove. At most you can demonstrate that there have been a handful of incidents where people have pretended to be somebody that they are not in order to create an argument. In the long term, only time will tell.

It also may not be accurate to call this a conspiracy in the traditional sense as in order for there to be a conspiracy there has to be an organized effort. To my mind this is many individuals working alone, and some in small groups, but the false flaggers don't conspire together. Most probably don't know who the other false flaggers are.


24. Ant left...
Saturday, 16 August 2008 1:41 am :: http://www.chineseantfarm.blogspot.com

Thank you for the quality response. I sense that you are right about the nebulousness of this conspiracy's origins. Like so many other conspiracy's, it can't be cornered. Nonetheless, I think that there may be a couple of wing-nuts out there posing as fenqing who are not even remotely fenqing, and doing so for the very reasons that you describe. Thanks. Come visit the Ant sometime on his Farm.


25. ACB left...
Saturday, 16 August 2008 5:24 am

Ant:

While I don't believe that there is necessarily an organized conspiracy, I certainly believe that there are many people out there pretending to be whom they are not, just to cause arguments or to ferment sentiment on false grounds in order to further their own cause.

I believe that this happens the world over, and that just as there are Americans pretending to be Chinese nationalists in order to raise hatred of Chinese nationalists, there are other's doing the same for every other cause.