Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

'Memoirs of a small minded Dumb*rse'

posted Wednesday, 28 December 2005

章子怡 (Zhang Ziyi) is undoubtedly one of China's greatest cinema assets. She is young, talented, and has stared in such domestic epics as 英雄 (Hero) and 十面埋伏 (Ambushes from all sides. Also known as 'House of Flying Daggers'). She has even broken into the notoriously fickle halls of Hollywood, with a role in the Smash Hit 'Rush Hour 2', where she stared alongside Jackie Chan, one of China's other great film exports.

So, you would think that she would be hailed as a hero, and showered in adulation by her fellow Chinese, for winning the coveted lead role in one of the most eagerly anticipated movies of 2005. No, quite the opposite in fact.

Instead of being congratulated, Zhang has been called 'Shameless' and denounced as a traitor by many Chinese. Why? because of acted outside her race, by playing a Japanese, when she accepted the role of 小百合/さゆり(Sayuri), the lead character in the film adaptation of Arthur Golden's controversial novel 'Memoirs of a Geisha'.

In a remarkable show of small mindedness, China's chat rooms and bulletin boards have, this month, been overflowing with criticism of Zhang. With many Chinese complaining that it was wrong for a Chinese to play the role of a Japanese, and denouncing her for taking part in a small number of 'intimate' scenes with Japanese actor
渡辺謙 (Watanabe Ken) . Which some Chinese referred to as being 'shameful, not just because her 'interaction' was with a Japanese, but also because it went against the polite fiction, that exists in China, that Chinese women 'do not do that kind of thing'.

Different people, Same Mindset

Unfortunately, criticism of the choice of Zhang for the lead in 'Memoirs' has not been limited to China, with similar controversies arising in Japan. Where a number of people have expressed disappointment that a foreigner, though not specifically a Chinese, had been selected to play the role of such an evocative Japanese figure, with some critics voicing that the role should have been reserved for a Japanese, and that the choice of non Japanese actress, to play a Japanese institution, was a poor one.

Complaints from Japan, where feelings in regards to Sino-Japanese issues are understandably not so heated as they are in China, however, appear to be more muted, and largely limited to a smaller section of society. Though they are no less small minded.


Shallow Arguments from Stupid People.

Fortunately for Zhang, and the wider film industry, critics of her role as the Geisha 小百合/さゆり (Sayuri) have not had the monopoly on criticism, and have themselves been criticized by Hollywood insiders and China watchers alike, as being shortsighted, racist, and of failing to understand 'the basic concept of acting'.

In defense of Zhang and her role, the actor 鞏俐 (Gong Li), a fellow Chinese who also stared in 'Geisha', decried Zhang's critics, both those in China and Japan, for complaining over something so shallow as the nationality of an actor.

In her defense of Zhang, Gong stood firmly by the principle that 'a role in a movie is the character that is presented to the audience, and not the actor who played it', and issued a strong reminder to audiences that cinema has a long standing history of diversity, and would have seen many great performances lost to the world if directors been as closed minded as Zhang's critics.


"Think of all the amazing performances that would be lost. Meryl Streep, as a Polish woman in `Sophie's Choice'. Russell Crowe, as an American in `The Insider'. Ralph Fiennes as a German in `Schindler's List'. Vivien Leigh, as an American in `Gone With the Wind'. Sir Anthony Hopkins ,as an American president in `Nixon'"

鞏俐 (Gong Li), Actress



Zhang also received a robust defense from the renowned master coach Chang Li, a senior teacher at 中央戏剧学院 (the Central Academy of Drama) in Beijing, who taught the young actor for four years.

Chang pronounced that, as an actress, Zhang should be free to take on any role that she saw fit, without fear of being criticized if that role did not match up to some esoteric standard set by observers in regards to who can or can't play who in a film.


"The criticism is unjustified. Zhang has the right to take any role she wants"

Chang Li, 中央戏剧学院 (Central Academy of Drama), Beijing



Chang also took time out to scold fellow Chinese for failing to recognize the prestige that Zhang has earned in winning such a coveted role, and the ground that she has set to help others to break out of the typecasting that has beset many Chinese actors.


"The Chinese people should be proud of her for getting the recognition she is receiving. Do you see Japanese audiences getting angry when a Japanese actress plays a Chinese character?"

Chang Li



Others have, at least in jest, also commented that it was a pleasant surprise that Hollywood picked an Asian to play 小百合/さゆり (Sayuri). A tongue in cheek reference to films such as 'The Conqueror', a Hollywood epic depicting of the life of Genghis Khan that was released in 1956, where most of the the films Asian lead characters were played by Whites and Hispanics (including John Wayne and Pedro Armendáriz) wearing makeup.

Other Complaints

While most of the complaints over Geisha have been shallow in nature, and are typified by the bickering over the nationality of the lead role, other's have gone deeper, and have more substance. Including the accusation that the production was written 'by an American, for Americans' and without a proper understanding of, or sensitivity to, Japanese; leading it to incorrectly portrayed Geisha as being similar to 'hostesses' in western bars, and into failing to correct some of the myths and misconceptions created by the book on which the film was based.

In this light, the film's crew and script writers were also criticized for 'an overly liberal attitude' towards the sensitivities surrounding both the portrayal of Japanese traditions, and their choice of a Chinese actress to play such an evocative Japanese role. With critics saying that their actions showed a blatant lack of understanding of both China and Japan, and of the conflicted national dynamic that exists between these two Asian neighbors because of Japan's bloodsoaked invasion of China during the first half of the Twentieth Century.

Critics of the production also accusing Hollywood of being purposfully 'blind' to cultural issues in the name of diversity, and of perpetuating the myth that 'all Asians are basically the same, because they look the same'; a fallacy that could be considered equal to the statement that “The presidents of America and France are both white, therefore they must think alike”.

Breaking the Mold, or setting the Standard?

Despite the complaints, most of which appear to emanate from traditionalists and ignorant nationalist agitators on both sides, Zhang's performance has been well received by many, including members of Japan's Geisha community, who saw nothing wrong with a Chinese playing the role of 小百合/さゆり (Sayuri), even if they did have issues with some elements of the film's script.

In touching gesture, and one far removed from any criticism of her or her role, Zhang is reported to have received a number of high quality antique Kimono, and a letter of gratitude, as a gift from a former Japanese Geisha, who congratulated her on bringing this evocative topic to life.

tags:                                      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. slim left...
Thursday, 29 December 2005 6:02 am

A fine, sensible post.

In a very minor quibble, I take issue with "In a remarkable show of small mindedness, China's chat rooms and bulletin boards have..."

I would find it remarkable only if Chinese chat rooms were NOT small minded. To my eyes and ears, they are always caldrons of ignorance and jingoism.


2. The Angry Chinese Blogger left...
Thursday, 29 December 2005 4:47 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

Basicly, I had a choice between saying that people had closed minds, or that they were ignorant rascists. I chose the least inflamitory of the two.


3. Sarah left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 12:35 pm :: http://www.journalscape.com/rhubarb/

Reading your descriptions of the attitudes towards Zhang's acting the role of a geisha was like stepping back into Victorian England, with the social/sexual roles so rigidly defined and puritan.

Do you think, in the long run, the controversy will destroy her film career? Is she in physical danger from extremists?


4. ACB left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 5:16 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

"Do you think, in the long run, the controversy will destroy her film career? Is she in physical danger from extremists?"

Personally, I don't think that this will damage her career in the long run.

Zhang is a great actress and a great asset to China. This controversy will jus get her even more exposure. I think that there are few Chinese directors who would refuse to cast her, and that most of the ones who would, wouldn't be making the kind of films that she would be in anyway.

Plus, she's broken into Hollywood already. This controversy has barely been noticed there, people just think that it's some silly fued and are quite ignorant of the seriousnes with which Chinese and Japanese take this issue. Even if she were exiled from China in disgrace by Beijing, she would still have a future in Hollywood.

I do notice however, two things

1) That some people are more upset about the fact that she did a sex scene or two with a Japanese, than anything else.

2) That these people are ignoring the fact that China has made about a million anti-Japanese movies or Chinese V Japanese martial arts movies with completely Chinese casts, meaning that thousends of Chinese have been playing Japanese for years.

Zhang is just one of the few Chinese to play a good Japanese.


5. Wuliao left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 7:34 pm

Beijing doesn't any problem with Zhang Ziyi. She even won the government-sponsored Golden Rooster award last month.

The controversy in China has more to do with Zhang Ziyi's unpopularity in her home country than Chinese disdain for Japan. The other two MoAG costars Gong Li and Michelle Yeoh didn't get bashed. Cecilia Cheung recently did a sex scene with a Japanese actor, not many people cared.


6. albert left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 7:35 pm

Sorry for being off topic:

"Newspaper staff strike over reshuffle" http://paowang.com/cgi-bin/forum/viewpost.cgi?which=paowang&id=578326


7. ACB left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 8:11 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

I understand Zhang isn't being critisized by the sate, only by the people, who really should know better.

"The controversy in China has more to do with Zhang Ziyi's unpopularity in her home country than Chinese disdain for Japan."

Why, exactly, is she unpopular?

Michelle Yeoh isn't mainland Chinese, she's an ethnic Chinese Malaysia living in Hong Kong (AKA, she's a foreigner), and she did recive some critisism over this in Hong Kong.

Gong Li wasn't the films lead so she naturally wouldn't recieve so much critisism, and she wasn't shown doing a sex scene with Wanatabe Ken (the Japanese male lead actor).


8. The BDF left...
Friday, 30 December 2005 10:35 pm :: http://blasphemousdopefiend.blogspot.com

Here in the United States, the movie is criticized not for the choices in casting, but because the movie itself sucks. Let's not lose sight of the fact that this is just a bad, bad, boring, pointless, uninteresting movie.


9. ACB left...
Saturday, 31 December 2005 1:45 am :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

BDF

No offence, but when an America says that a film about another culture or country is a "bad, bad, boring, pointless, uninteresting movie", I tend to question whether what they actually mean is 'I didn't understand it', or 'it didn't have neough fight scenes in it'.

America tastes in films tend to be rather mono cultural.

Then again, it was written by an America and made by an American studio - for American audiences. So it might actually be, as you said, a rather rubish film.


10. Wuliao left...
Saturday, 31 December 2005 6:56 pm

"Why, exactly, is she unpopular?"

The common perception in China is Zhang's success come from not talnet but sheer luck, and some people, under the influence of HK/Mainland entertainment taboids, think she's some kind of 'attention whore'.


11. ACB left...
Saturday, 31 December 2005 7:00 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

That sounds a touch like envy to me.


12. The BDF left...
Wednesday, 4 January 2006 6:04 pm :: http://blasphemousdopefiend.blogspot.com

So wait. You were about to call people "ignorant racists" according to one of your earlier comments, and then you turn around and make sweeping, yet totally misinformed statements about Americans.

Just checking. Keep up the good work.


13. ACB left...
Wednesday, 4 January 2006 6:44 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

First of all, you have to QUOTE ME, I can't defend my comment if I don't know which one you are talking about.

Secondly, I have to speak in general terms a lot of the time. Don't blame me, there are exceptions to everything and I can't account for them all.

I take it that you are talking about the 'American's not understanding foreign films' comment above (even though Geisha was about a foreign culture, but was made by Americans. Well .....

It is a fact, not just for America, but for the entire world, that people often don't like imported movies or movies about forieng countries because they don't understand them or because they stray from whatever the national preferance in that country is.

American's tend to like fast-moving, loud, and in your face productions. Which Geisha wasn't. If saying this is rascist, then I am a rascist. I firmly believe that Americans like different kinds of movies from other foriegners, and they don't like movies about topics that do not interest them or which are about cultures which are alien to them.

However, I don't think that I'm a rascist, I was just pointing aout the inate differences between tastes in different countires.

For example, I could show the greatest Chinese or British costume drama in the world to your average American (Canadian, Mexican, Spanish, Russia, or even icelandic) audience, their first comment is likely to be that it is boring and pointless. Yet their native audiences will love it.

This doens't mean that the drama was bad, or that the audience was stupid, only that they didn't like it because A) they didn't understand the cultural perspective, and B) because it didn't meet up to their criteria for a good film.

I hold US DVD sales and box office seat up as my evidence. Most films in the US are domestic films about domestic interests. There are very few international films on screen in the US. Even Spanish films are comparibly rare, and a huge section of the US populaiton is decended from Spanish cultures.

I can take just about any American comedy or drama and I will describe it as being boring and pointless because my country has a very different idea about comedy and drama, specifically, we like a lot more depth to it, and a lot less bravado, and I'm pretty sure that you would accuse me of not liking it because I didn't understand it, or because it was different from those produced in my country.