Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

You don't have to be mad to protest in China, but it helps.

posted Sunday, 22 January 2006

To paraphrase the old wester adage, "You don't have to be crazy to protest in China, but it help". And if you don't happen to be crazy, there is apparently nothing to stop the state from saying that you are, and locking you up.

According a reports released by the New York based human rights group 中國人權 (Human Rights in China) , Liu Xinjuan, a prominent 上海 (Shanghai) land activist who is well known for her efforts in fighting forced evictions and illegal land-seizures, was detained earlier this week, and committed to a mental institution on state orders.

Although there has been little official word on the reasons for Liu's detention and subsequent committal, sources indicate that she was seized by Chinese security force in
静安 (Jiang'an) District Park, Shanghai, on 16 January.

After her seizure, Liu was taken to a secured compound, thought to be the Qibao Dispatch Station, in
上海 (Sanghai)'s 闵行区(Minhang District), where she was interrogated by security forces for several hours, before being transfered to the Beiqiao Mental Hospital. Where she was committed for 'treatment' on the grounds that she was 'mentally unsound'.

Reports indicate that Liu was 'bound and gagged' during the transfer, and that she had been badly beaten while in custody.

Prior to her detention, Lui had been attempting to meet with fellow activists in
静安 (Jiang'an) District Park, in preparation for a march to deliver a petition to state official meeting in the Sanghai Sino-Soviet Friendship Building.

"litigation mania"

Although not often spoken of, it is a well known for Chinese authorities to commit persistent protectors and activists, like Liu, to mental institutions, under the claim that they are suffering from persecution complexes that cause them to mount 'irrational campaigns of harassment' against state or corporate interests.

This condition has been colloquially dubbed "litigation mania" by Chinese Police psychiatrists, and authorities claim that, by detaining activists in mental institutes, they are 'serving the public good' and 'protecting stability.

However, "litigation mania" and the detention of activists in mental institutions has been categorically dismissed, by human rights interests, as being 'an excuse' to detain persistent protectors outside of the normal judicial system, and as a tool to discredit them as being 'mentally unsound' in a country where mental illness is still not publicly understood

Liu was previously committed to a mental institution in 2003 because of her protest activities.

tags:                          

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. bert left...
Sunday, 22 January 2006 9:51 am

Have you seen the commercials in the US for medicine to treat "Restless Leg Syndrome"?!!

  • It's the people with money and the power that are the maniacs. They just want to make us the same way. This world is getting darker everyday. I think I am getting "P.C. mania". I go crazy everytime I come back home and see how the P.C. police on T.V. are making people with commonsense look like the mentally ill. If you don't say it just right you are either racist or whatever-phobe or sexually harrassing someone. The US might start doing the same to people who aren't P.C. enough. But first they will try to medicate us.


2. ACB left...
Sunday, 22 January 2006 6:05 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

Fortunately for me, I haven't had cause to visit the US for quite some time, so I haven't even heard of "Restless Leg Syndrome" (it's probably called something different where I come from), so i can't comment on the adverts.

What I can say though is “DON'T GET ME STARTED ON PC”.

As far as I can see, western PC just another form of censorship and brainwashing. It commands that you think a certain way and then denounces you if you think differently or if you ask too many questions. It is just as bad as the Chinese Web police and their campaign against “unhealthy ideas”.

PC make tries to make you say that white is black and black is 'African America', and, as you so rightly pointed out, it shouts down anybody with enough common sense to think independently.

Denouncing somebody for not being PC is just as bad as calling the unpatriotic.

I recently had a number of run ins with Americans over PC and TV censorship, and had to point out that a lot of the foreign TV programs that the US imports (particularly children's programs) are actually censored for so-called “moral content” (plus environmentalism and anti-nuclear messages, which is weird, but which fits in with the Republican agenda), and they remove some really daft things, or add in messages about 'diversity' that were never in the original shows and sound really out of place.

I've also noticed that modern American TV seems to jump between three extremes, TV that sets out to shock (eg MTV), TV that is written by a committees and focus groups that ends up as meaningless PC drivel that is supposed to promote tolerances and diversity, but which just ends up lacking in any real content (eg, Disney), and News, which servers only to promote the US agenda (sorry, I'm just really against the 'What's right for America is right for the world' attitude).


3. ACB left...
Sunday, 22 January 2006 6:12 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

Have you noticed that both American and Britain now routinely arrest political dissidents under anti-terror laws, branding them 'terrorists', unpatriotic, and unAmerica (or unBritish) if they dare to speak out against the establishment. No, it's true. Last year, Washington used anti terror laws to detain dozens of environmentalists, anti-globalization protectors and anti-war protesters, and in Britain they even went so far as to use anti terror laws to detain an senior citizen who was reading a list of names of dead soldiers outside the British government building. They dragged her off the street for 'glorifying terror' or some other such rubbish. This is just one small step away from what China is doing.


4. Lady Cooper left...
Monday, 23 January 2006 1:02 pm :: http://ladycooper.co.nr

America is just going crazy, there are some serious fundamental problems there. Here in Canada, we're painfully P.C, but in the way that it ties into the (real) stereotypes of Canadians being polite and sensible. The biggest issue here is around holidays, especially religious ones, where people get twitchy when someone says, "God". But, we allow protest, even when the G8 was in my city, there were huge protests, but there was neither violence nor arrests. And I'm not too sure if we even have anti-terror laws apart from "please don't kill our citizenry".


5. ACB left...
Monday, 23 January 2006 4:46 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

I must say that I REAL do not understand this North American thing about church and state.

It seems so bizzare. As I understand US and Canadian law, the state can't force you to be religious, and it can't favor one faith over another, but what both appear to be doing is to be banning religious people from carrying out their faith anywhere but within a religious building or their own home.

This is doubly weird for America since America was largely founded by refugees fleeing religious persecution by the state, and half of its laws and foreign policy are based on religion.


6. bert left...
Tuesday, 24 January 2006 12:46 pm

It is sad indeed. It seems that China (albiet slowly) is opening up and America is becoming more tyranical:( One day there will no difference btwn the two.

  • There used to be a day when the local police were just that, local. Training and "education" was more or less local. And they "protected" the society. Now they are sent to the capital of their state and "indoctrinated" and "educated" by the state. Then they come back and "enforce" the laws. They don't protect anyone except the state and themselves. Americans have been so beaten down with P.C. we can't speak the truth. I have more freedom of speech in my Chinese classroom than I would in an American class!


7. bert left...
Wednesday, 25 January 2006 3:08 am

Has anyone noticed the road/picture signs in Beijing (mainly around the embassy areas) that show/demand "no exploding vehicles"! I know it isn't P.C. but it is just as stupid:)


8. Sarah left...
Wednesday, 25 January 2006 8:52 am :: http://www.journalscape.com/rhubarb/

I'm going to take the other side of the argument, just to see how it might work: sanity is defined by what is socially acceptable, "normal" behavior and speech. A person whose behavior and speech goes a certain distance beyond the norm is considered to be not sane or crazy. Hence, fear of being run over by a speeding vehicle so you look both ways before crossing the street is sane, but fear of vehicles so intense that you cannot leave the house or cross the street is insane and needs treatment.

OK so far? Then consider this: Is it normal to stand in the street and scream protests against the government? Could the protester be considered insane (paranoid)?

Just a question.


9. ACB left...
Thursday, 26 January 2006 4:28 pm :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

I would say that crazy isn't so much what you do, but rather your state of mind when you do it. If you are rational and controlled, then you are not crazy

If you "scream protests against the government" because they stole your farm and you are angry, then you are sane, but if you do it because you think that the are green lizards from the pegasus galaxy, then you are crazy.

You can say that not being 'normal' or conforming to social norms makes you crazy, but I've read up on western history and have seen this version of 'sanity' used to lock up women who became pregnant out of wedlock (in some countries the standard treatment fo rthis used to include electro shock treatment), and in China to detain homosexuals.

Under this definition, every anti-war protester in the US is mentally unsound.