Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

One party, one China, one child .... One Dog?

posted Saturday, 11 November 2006
While 8 is considered to lucky in China, and 4 is considered much less so (one being a homonym for good fortune and the other for death), the number 1 is probably the most recurring number in modern Chinese culture and politics.

There is 1 China, which is a 1 party state where families are only permitted 1 child, who will be taught that China has 1 continuous history that can be interpreted only 1 way and, if that child is a farmer in central China, they might well be forced to live on about $US1 a day.

What with all these 1s, you might think that there was no room for any more. Unfortunately, Beijing can always find room for 1 more 1.

One China, one Dog

Under newly unveiled legislation, families living in 9 districts of Beijing will only be permitted to own 1 dog per household. Families found harboring additional dogs, or keeping unregistered dogs, will face legal sanctions, and 'extraneous dogs' will be put to death by animal control authorities unless their owners are able to pass them on to a dog-less household.

In addition to the one dog per household limit, dogs will be banned from many of Beijing's public areas and green space. Large dogs will also be prohibited in certain areas, and forced to travel under restraint in others.

  "Only one pet dog is allowed per household in the zones, and dangerous and large dogs will be banned. Anyone keeping an unlicensed dog will face prosecution"

Xinhua, State Media agency, China
 

Once bitten, Twice Shy

Officially, the new dog control measures are part of Beijing's efforts to crack down on rabies infection, which have now reached alarming levels and which result several hundred per month across greater China. Unofficially, the dog eradication program will also reduce the number of dogs on the streets (Chinese dogs are often allowed to roam freely during the day, and are often not spade or neutered, resulting in large populations of stray/apparently stray dogs) during the 2008 Olympic games.

Beijing's crackdown on dog ownership comes after several areas of South China launched dog kulling programs, including Shandong Province, which ordered every civilian owned dog within three miles of a rabies outbreak be destroyed. At the time, provincial authorities were unable to reveal the true extent of the outbreaks, or release much information on the kulling process because of state restrictions releasing information about serious public health issues.

  "I cannot reveal any information because this is an epidemic situation and I need authorization to talk."

Spokesperson,  Center for Disease Control and Surveillance, Jining, Shandong
 

Other Kullings, such as that carried out in Mouding county, Yunnan province, resulted in 50,000 dogs being destroyed.

Criticism

Beijing's policy announcement has received sharp criticism from both China watchers and animal welfare organizations, who have accused Chinese authorities of writing legislation without properly understanding the issue at hand.

  "It is wrong to consider dogs as a threat to human beings. There are no evil dogs, only bad masters.... We should learn from other countries' experiences, instead of allowing the fates of our dogs to be decided by the whims of officials."

Meng Xiaoshe, Dog Daily (website)
 

Among the criticisms offered has been that the policy is misdirected, aiming at reducing the number of dogs in order to reduce instances of rabies, rather than reducing the instances of rabies among dogs.

  "We believe it's a policy that is misplaced in that the focus should be on rabies vaccination rather than a limitation on the number of dogs in a household"

Wayne Pacelle, President, Humane Society of the United States
 

Although the rabies vaccine is available in China, there is no state mandated vaccination program, and it is thought that only around 3 percent of dogs have received it.

Additionally, while the legislation singles out larger dogs for destruction and ownership reduction, 80% of dog bite injuries are caused by small dogs, which make up the vast majority of all dogs owned in China.

Stark criticism has also been handed out over Beijing's destruction policy, which China watchers have described as being 'unnecessarily cruel', particularly as it will force families to choose which of their pets will live and which will die.

  "Owners who wish to dispose of their pets should hand them over to local dog control authorities"

Xinhua
 

The Numbers

According to the Chinese media, there are approximately 550,000 dogs currently registered in Beijing, and a similar number of unregistered dogs. Registration costs 1,000 yuan per dog.

Between January and September this years there were 2,254 cases of rabies. Resulting in 318 deaths in September alone. These instances represent a 30% rise on figures for 2005, during which time 69,000 people in Beijing sought precautionary anti-rabies treatment.

tags:                  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Sarah left...
Tuesday, 14 November 2006 8:25 am :: http://www.journalscape.com/rhubarb/

Maybe China should start culling the bureaucrats, hmmm? I agree that household pets should be spayed or neutered, and I would urge officials to stop and reflect: how we treat our dependent animals is much how we treat our children and ultimately each other. One of the best ways to teach a child to empathize with others and to care for the natural world around us is to teach him/her to care for a pet, especially a dog.


2. lainiehas left...
Saturday, 18 November 2006 1:56 am

Yet another reason to get a cat.

How much do rabies vaccinations cost?


3. ACB left...
Saturday, 18 November 2006 2:44 am :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

Hmmm, cats can get rabies too. Or maybe Beijing doesn't know this.

I don't personally know exactly how much a rabies vacination course costs (I''ve never had cause to ask), but the price is generally described as being high.


4. ACB left...
Saturday, 18 November 2006 2:49 am :: http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com

I've just been informed that registration and vacination together can cost somewhere between 4 and 5 thousend Yuan depending on where you live. Which is quite a wedge of money for most Chinese, even in a city like Beijing.


5. Cliffwuhan left...
Thursday, 23 November 2006 7:05 am

I must agree that the owner is responsable for it's dog ,if the owner is not with dog ? Kill dog . If the owner of an infected dog attacks . Kill both . Not just Biejing eather .


6. mcbbq left...
Saturday, 25 November 2006 2:35 pm

I think that the Chinese government just treat dogs as animals. But, in dog owner's eyes, their dogs are members of the family. I think that it is too cruel.


7. V left...
Thursday, 30 November 2006 3:59 pm :: http://beijingblogging.blogspot.com/

One China, one child, one dog... lol... that's pretty funny for some reason. Well a link would be appreciated; your place here sounds really interesting.

tc!


8. Matt/Chabuduo left...
Sunday, 3 December 2006 8:06 pm :: http://chabuduo.sinosplice.com

I will use the fact that I was recently bitten by a dog in China and am having my last rabies shot tonight to shamelessly promote <a href="http://chabuduo.sinosplice.com">my own post</a> about dog bites and rabies vaccinations in China. I've included prices and Chinese/English vocab etc.

Sorry ACB, but I couldn't give up such a wonderful opportunity for self-promotion. :)


9. Veterinarian USA left...
Tuesday, 19 December 2006 3:09 pm

As an american chinese veterinarian, I found this very interesting. Absolutely, dogs, cats all mammals can carry rabies, so I can understand why China is trying to enforce some control on the situation. Unfortunately I don't think allowing one dog per household is going to fix it. For one, the absolute first aim should be to reduce the number of stray dogs (in other words, dogs that are not kept by a family). These dogs should be euthanized (or ideally neutered and rehomed but sadly I fear the problem is too big for this option). This will reduce the number of dogs that are a) exposed to the disease and b) that can spread the disease. Secondly, laws should enforce responsible dog ownership. Dogs should always be leashed- not only for the sake of rabies, but for the sake of children and other passers by that may be bitten. Any unleashed dogs wandering the streets should be quarantined/euthanized.

Of course vaccination would be ideal, but there are too many dogs right now, and people aren't looking after them well enough. Perhaps once China has reached a point where dogs are kept responsibly, have identifiable owners, then they can start a vaccination program.

The most effective way of reducing rabies deaths is education of children and locals- NEVER approach a dog or any wildlife on the streets- particularly if it is very friendly. Rabies causes a change in behaviour- wild animals can become unusually friendly and then bite people- it is how the virus ensures that it gets spread. If any bites occurs, the area should be washed with water and soap for 20 minutes straight and medical attention sought IMMEDIATELY for post exposure vaccinations.


10. Kim left...
Monday, 26 February 2007 12:15 am

A new organization to be aware of: www.dogsinasia.com - It is just getting off the ground. If anyone has first hand knowledge of the situation in China, and would like to contribute their thoughts/ideas, I'm sure the group owners would welcome it!


11. Jin Hui left...
Monday, 26 March 2007 2:36 pm

Somebody start a petition. This is cruel and barbaric, no living dog should have it's life ended just because of this retarded law. If they want to stop rabies then they have to take better care of their dogs(don't abandon them). This is a problem to people everywhere, but this won't help the olympics in china this year. The cause of rabies is because of the locals abandoning their dogs or abandoning the puppies that are from their dogs. Me talking about this won't change anything, but i will eventually want to and will make an end to this.

Jin Hui(12)


12. student in bejing left...
Saturday, 21 July 2007 9:41 pm

hello,

i'm in beijing studying chinese now (it seems a popular thing to do as of late), and i asked my teacher about the dogs. i don't know how correct this information is, but she informed me that it costs 8000 kuai a year to keep a dog and is thus usually only done by people who lead otherwise meaningless lives. she seemed rather adamant about this last fact, i'm not sure why... we asked her if families ever kept dogs to play with children. she said yes, and then repeated that if we see a person with a dog it is probably because their life is without interest. (the simplicity of the conversation may have something to do with the fact that i have only been studying chinese for a year, and any deeper level of conversation would have been impossible, but still... it is intriguing.)

i would also like to say that i have seen a lot of tiny dogs, and a lot of tiny dogs in bicycle baskets, and a lot of tiny dogs without leashes, but relatively few stray ones (stray cats, though, yes). but then again, i have not left beijing.


13. ACB left...
Friday, 27 July 2007 2:54 am

I'm not from Beijing so I don't know how much dogs cost, but they can be quite expensive especially if you give them their shots.

As for the comment on the type of people who keep dogs, I think that it's fair to say that they are often kept as child substitutes or as a sort of alive doll toy. Kind of like Paris Hilton and her dog. It's also true that most dogs are the small kind. Often, large dogs are only kept as guard animals. They are expensive to keep and to feed and they don't live well in apartments or modern houses.


14. a w cole left...
Monday, 17 March 2008 12:24 am

sarah- DUH! What do expect in a repressed commie craphole like China? Dio you think for a SECOND they treat their people well? They are poisoning their people with coal-fired and factory based uncontrolled emissions, changing history (lying) to their people about the Chinese right to control Tibet, feeding our pets food that's deadly, poisoning our children (and I assume theirs as well) with colorful lead paint toys, controlling access to the Internet. In 4000 years of civilization, the Chinese should have starships and hydrogen fusion power- yet they are barely out of the stone age. All thanks to their emperors and now their commie leaders, which are the worst of all. Aided and abetted by WalMart (and the fools who shop there) they are flooding the world with their slave-produced, inferior quality, cheap junk...and stealing many fine blue-collar, clean and safe (in comparison) factory jobs where quality items once came from. They are a blight on humanity. And you expect them to treat their animals well?


15. ACB left...
Monday, 17 March 2008 1:10 am

In China's favor, at least it doesn't water board foreign nationals in secret prisons.

China's no picture of integrity, but it's not alone. Not by a long shot.