Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

London Olympic procession dogged by protests: Beijing Humiliated

posted Monday, 7 April 2008

You probably don't need to be a China watcher to known that Sunday was the day that the Beijing 2008 torch passed through the UK, or that it was set up to be one of the more controversial legs of the torch's journey. You also likely don't need to be a China watcher to know that the day in question turned out to be every bit as controversial, and every bit as embarrassing - for both Beijing and London - as it was predicted to be.

Indeed, protesters lined the streets, 2,000 police officers had to be drafted in to keep the peace. There were running battles near the British parliament as protesters attempted to break through police lines, and number of highly visible incident occurred along the way. All of which occurred in full view of the world's media. Lending further credence to media pronouncements that the wider Beijing 2008 torch procession is shaping up to be "a public relations disaster".

While traveling through London, the torch itself had to be protected by two ring of security. An inner ring of Chinese Olympic security, and an outer ring of British police security. By the end of the procession protests had become so heavy that guards around the torch were running three deep. Even the UK official in charge of the Olympic affairs was forced to admit the strength of public feeling.

"there are many citizens of the UK who feel very strongly about China's human rights record, there are people in the UK who feel very strongly about the importance of dialogue with the Dalai Lama, and that in the UK we cherish the right to lawful and peaceful protest"

Tessa Jowell, Minister for the Olympics, London

Contrary to earlier reports, Fu Ying, the Mainland Ambassador to London was able to take part in the procession. However, the move proved to come at a cost of face to both Beijing and London.

Secure Start

In order to ensure that the opening of the London torch procession was not interrupted by demonstrators, British authorities were forced to hold it behind closed doors. Starting it off inside a closed off sports stadium without a public audience.

Shenanigans?

In an effort to save face over earlier speculation the issue of Ambassador Fu Ying and the torch run, London opted to switched the parade route at the last minute in order to allow the embattled Ambassador to take part. However, instead of carrying the torch between locations symbolic to the UK and UK ideals, the Ambassador was instead forced to travel through London's Chinatown district. Although Overseas Chinese and ex-pats living in the area  were able to attend, the regions white population was mostly absent due to the short notice.

China watchers noted that London failed to notify the public of the change until the last minute. Effectively bypassing British law which permits public protests by denying protesters the right to know the location of the event in advance. Some China watchers dubbed London's actions as being unsurprising but nonetheless humiliating for both Beijing and London: An admission from both parties that they have collectively failed to win the hearts and minds of the wider British populace.

Fruther Shenanigans

In other incidents of official law bending, a number of Pro independence Tibetan groups who had officially liaised with UK authorities in order to carry out organized demonstrations close to the British museum, where Ambassador Fu Ying was due to run, found themselves contained behind double depth crowd control barriers, some distance from the route and unable to get close the procession.

After negotiating with local police authorities, some of the more prominent groups were able to get permission to move closer. At present it is unclear whether the police will face censure for this.

Incidents

Though reports are still coming in, it is known that there were a number of incidents along the route in which demonstrators managed to break through police lines and to come close enough to the torch to embarrass authorities. In one incident a demonstrator attempted to take the torch from children's TV presenter Konnie Huq, a British born Bangladeshi, as she tried to pass it on to the next runner. The demonstrator, a Tibetan independence campaigner, came close enough to Huq touch the torch, but was prevented from going further by security forces.

Huq, who signed up to carry the torch between Ladbroke Grove and Notting Hill had been called on to boycott the procession but decided to take part despite reservations over Beijing's actions. In an earlier interview Huq stated that she stated that she had decided to take part because Britain was the next host of the Olympics, and not out of deference to Beijing. During the interview Huq soundly criticized Beijing, referring to it as a "bad egg": a British English idiom meaning to be dishonest and/or worthless.

I’m doing it because I support the London Olympics in 2012, but I don’t condone China’s actions

Konnie Huq, Children's television presenter (Sunday Times, 6 April 2008)

Protesters also attempted to grab the torch as it was carried near  the Big Ben clock tower by 17 year-old school boy Scott Earley.

America's CNN new service carried pictures of a protester being wrestled to the ground by a half dozen police officers in the region of Holland Park, after setting of a carbon dioxide fire extinguisher in an attempt to put out the flame. Two people were arrested at the scene.

Plans to carry the torch on foot had to be abandoned at Fleet Street due to the weight of protesters, and fears that police might not be able to contain them, and the torch instead had to be carried to St Paul's Cathedral bus. However traveling by motor vehicle this did not stop further humiliating incidents from occurring.

While attempting to complete the Oxford Street section of the procession, the bus carrying the torch was forced to stop after gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell blocked its route by jumping into the road while holding a sign bearing the legend "Free Tibet, Free Hu Jia". Tatchell, a well known campaigner in the UK, was detained but not arrested.

Numerous other incidents and protest occurred along the route. It is believer that approximately 35 demonstrators were arrested, while an unknown number were detained or otherwise contained some distance away from the procession.

Similar protests are expected in many other cities taking part in the wider processions. It is not yet clear in all cases how authorities in each individual city plan to proceed, or how much demonstrations they will permit.

Chinese Coverage

As is traditional, the Mainland made no mention of the demonstrations and screened only footage that did not include demonstrators. The opening ceremony was also screened in an a zoomed format, making it difficult for audiences to see that it was being held without spectators.

tags:              

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. BeWay left...
Monday, 7 April 2008 10:17 pm

Care to read the latest updates that China will renact the following policies; 1. Millions of job vacancies to all Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchu...Miao...) who want to migrate to Tibet. The place need more development please - No human right abuse, of course 2. Bonus & incentive plan to all Chinese who intend to produce more childs. The more the merry. Tibet is just too sparsely populated - No human right abuse, of course Say what Dalai Lama wants to say, he had lost the very land as a result of his folly in the failed armed uprising. Maybe Nancy Pelosi is capable enough to take care of his daily frustration from now onwards. Peace prevailed forever. Adieu.


2. The Masked Millionaire left...
Tuesday, 8 April 2008 1:39 am :: http://www.TheMaskedMillionaire.com

The best quote I have read is this: "The olympics should not be allowed to take place in the world's biggest prision--China"

www.TheMaskedMillionaire.com


3. ACB left...
Tuesday, 8 April 2008 2:09 am

If you want to talk prison populations, America's three strikes policy means that it is one of the most prolific jailers.

If you are caught carrying a small amount of drugs for personal use in China you will go away for maybe 6 year (three two year stints). If do the same in some parts of the US you can get life.


4. Bill left...
Wednesday, 9 April 2008 8:47 am

ACB: the maskedmillionaire doesn't mean criminals. Just prisoners, especially those did not commit any crime. China has 1.3 billion of prisoners who are totally innocent. No other country can compete with that.


5. ACB left...
Friday, 11 April 2008 2:53 am

Bill:

You're reading fro the wrong column. 1.3 billion is the number of people in China. Many of those people actually want to be in China.


6. ACB left...
Friday, 11 April 2008 3:24 am

Bill:

You'll have to forgive me for being so blunt, but that's a singularly ignorant statement to make.

Many people in China "don't want" the kind of freedom that you have in the West. People in China have different priorities and different concepts of how far freedoms should be extended. For example, you have the right to bear arms, most Chinese consider this to be a very bad thing indeed.

Many also consider press freedoms in the West to have gone too far, and they would actively protest against them if you tried to introduce them in China on the grounds that many Western newspapers and magazines are nothing more than gossip rags that inflate the smallest thing in malicious ways just to make money. People in China don't want that.


7. a civilian Chinese left...
Friday, 11 April 2008 5:54 pm

Liars, utterly liars. We ordinary Chinese watched TV and observed the every actions of so-called protestors, i.e. rioters, did! We, everyone in China, watched every ugly and malicious thing they did and wait in China when they arrive. We will taught them what is what the oridinary Chinese think and let them learn a lesson!