Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

The Chinese are coming

posted Monday, 3 September 2007
While Congress might bleat on about the threat of China's so-called "military expansion"; which, in reality has, seen its armed forces shed hundreds of thousands of personnel, or the danger that of shoddy goods; proof that quality and price sometimes go hand in hand, here's the real reason why US officials are messing their shorts over China right now. Beijing is making its presence felt big time. It is reaching markets that America has as yet been unable to penetrate, and winning influence in areas where anti-American sentiment is on the rise. As as Professor says below "In the past, if a state wanted to expand, it had to take territory. You don't need to grab colonies any more. You just need to have competitive goods to trade."

What this might mean in the long run is unclear, except that it looks very much like the world of tomorrow will have a whole lot more China in it, and that Beijing's rise will come at Washington's expense. Happy reading. Be warned, if you're a neo-con, this will make your blood boil.

Care of William Foreman, journalist and China watcher:

China's influence spreads around world

KARRATHA, Australia - For nearly three decades, Chinese peasants have left their villages for crowded dormitories and sweaty assembly lines, churning out goods for world markets. Now, China is turning the tables.

Here in the Australian Outback, Shane Padley toils in the scorching heat, 2,000 miles from his home, to build an extension to a liquefied natural gas plant that feeds China's ravenous hunger for energy.

At night, the 34-year-old carpenter sleeps in a tin dwelling known as a "donga," the size of a shipping container and divided into four rooms, each barely big enough for a bed. There are few other places for Padley to live in this boomtown.

Duct-taped to the wall is a snapshot of the blonde girlfriend he left behind and worries he may lose. But, he says, "I can make nearly double what I'd be making back home in the Sydney area."

The reason: China.

For years, China's booming economy touched daily life in the West most visibly through the "made-in-China" label on everything from clothes to computers. But now, economic growth is giving rise to something more that can't be measured just by widgets and gadgets — a shift in China's balance of power with the rest of the world.

China's reach now extends from the Australian desert through the Sahara to the Amazonian jungle — and it's those regions supplying goods for China, not just the other way around. China has stepped up its political and diplomatic presence, most notably in Africa, where it is funneling billions of dollars in aid. And it is increasingly shaping the lifestyle of people around the world, as the United States did before it, right down to the Mandarin-language courses being taught in schools from Argentina to Virginia.

China, like the United States, is also learning that global power cuts both ways. The backlash over tainted toothpaste and toxic pet food has been severe, as has the criticism over China's support for regimes such Sudan's.

To understand why China's influence is increasingly pushing past its borders, just do the math.

When 1.3 billion people want something, the world feels it. And when those people in ever increasing numbers are joining a swelling middle class eager for a richer lifestyle, the world feels it even more.

If China's growth continues, its consumer market will be the world's second largest by 2015. The Chinese already eat 32 percent of the world's rice, build with 47 percent of its cement and smoke one out of every three cigarettes.

China's desire for expensive hardwood to turn into top-quality floorboards for its luxury skyscrapers has penetrated deep into the Amazon jungle. For example, in the isolated community of Novo Progresso, or New Progress in Portuguese, one of the biggest sawmills was started by the mayor with financing from Chinese investors.

China accounts for 30 percent of the wood exported from logging operations in remote towns across Brazil's rain forest, where trucks carry the finished product hundreds of miles along muddy roads to river ports, said Luiz Carlos Tremonte, who heads an influential wood industry association. Many Chinese purchasers now travel to Brazil to clinch deals, and are almost always accompanied at business meetings by friends or relatives of Chinese descent who live there.

"Ten years ago no one knew about China in Brazil; then the demand just exploded and they're buying a lot," Tremonte said. "This wood is great for floors, and they love it there."

The Bovespa stock index in Brazil has climbed more than 300 percent since 2002, riding the China wave.

China is buying coal mining equipment from Poland and drilling for oil and gas in Ethiopia and Nigeria. It has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Zambia's copper industry. It is the world's biggest market for mobile phones, headed for 520 million handsets this year. The list goes on.

Along with looking to other countries for goods for its people, China is also going far and wide in search of markets for its products.

In war-torn Liberia, where electricity is hard to come by, Chinese-made Tiger generators keep the local economy humming. Costlier Western brands, favored by aid agencies and diplomats, are beyond the reach of small business owners such as Mohammed Kiawu, 30, who runs a phone stall in the capital, Monrovia.

A used Tiger generator costs around $50, he said over the steady beat of his generator. "But even $250 is not enough to buy a used American or European generator. They are not meant for people like myself."

The Chinese generators are more prone to break down, Kiawu said. When the starter cable snapped on one, he replaced it with twine. But by making items for ordinary people, he predicted, China "will take control of the heart of the common people of Africa soon."

China is having to make up for decades of economic stagnation after the communist takeover in 1949.

When Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping began dabbling in economic reforms in 1978, farmers were scraping by. By 2005, income had increased sixfold after adjusting for inflation to $400 a year for those in the countryside and $1,275 for urban Chinese, according to China's National Bureau of Statistics.

"The Chinese don't want war — the Chinese just want to trade their way to power," said David Zweig, a professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. "In the past, if a state wanted to expand, it had to take territory. You don't need to grab colonies any more. You just need to have competitive goods to trade."

If China stays on the same economic track, it would become the world's largest economy in 2027, surpassing the United States, according to projections by Goldman, Sachs & Co., a Wall Street investment bank. And unlike Japan, which rose in the 1980s only to fade again, China still has a huge pool of workers to tap and an emerging middle class that is just starting to reach critical mass. Many development economists believe China still has 20 years of fairly high growth ahead.

But the transition to a larger presence on the global stage comes with growing pains, for China and the rest of the world.

As Beijing plays an ever bigger role in the developing world, some Western countries fear it could undermine efforts to promote democracy. In its attempt to secure markets and win allies, China is stepping up development aid to Africa and Asia. Chinese President Hu Jintao pledged last year to double Chinese aid to Africa between 2006 and 2009, promising $3 billion in loans, $2 billion in export credits and a $5 billion fund to encourage Chinese investment in Africa. China has also promised Cambodia a $600 million aid package and agreed to loan $500 million to the Philippines for a rail project.

But China also extends aid to states such as Myanmar, Zimbabwe and Sudan whose human rights records have lost them the support of the West. Actress Mia Farrow has labeled next year's Beijing Olympics — a point of pride for China — the "genocide Olympics" because of China's support for Sudan, at a time when the West seeks to punish it for its military actions in Darfur. China buys two-thirds of Sudan's oil output.

"In some ways, it will be integrating us into a new international order in which democracy as we've known it or the right to open organized political activity is no longer considered the norm," said James Mann, author of "The China Fantasy," a book about China and the West.

China is also facing some of the unease that powers before it have encountered. In Africa and Asia, some complain that massive China-funded infrastructure projects involve mostly Chinese workers and companies, rather than create jobs and wealth for the local population. And Moeletsi Mbeki, a political commentator and brother of South African President Thabo Mbeki, likens the trade of African resources for Chinese manufactured goods to former colonial arrangements.

"This equation is not sustainable," Mbeki said at a recent meeting of the African Development Bank in Shanghai. "Africa needs to preserve its natural resources to use in the future for its own industrialization."

The backlash is also coming on the consumer front, with Chinese goods earning a dubious reputation for quality. In the United States, there is a furor over the standard of Chinese imports. In Bolivia, vendors peel off or paint over any indication that their wares were "Hecho en China," Spanish for "Made in China."

A woman selling bicycles in El Alto, a poor city outside the capital, La Paz, insisted they were made in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan or even India. With some prodding, she acknowledged the truth. "They're all Chinese," she said, declining to give her name lest it hurt her business. "But if I say they're Chinese, they don't sell."

Even those who benefit from China's growth express some wariness. Aerospace giant Boeing expects China to be the largest market for commercial air travel outside the United States in the next 20 years, buying more than $100 billion worth of commercial aircraft, U.S. trade envoy Karan Bhatia said in a recent speech.

"Right now, we're hiring every week," noted Connie Kelliher, a union leader. "Things couldn't be better."

Yet Boeing workers remain wary of China's ambitions to build its own planes. next year China plans to test-fly a locally made midsize jet seating 78 to 85 passengers. It also has announced plans to roll out a 150-seat plane by 2020.

"It's kind of a double-edged sword," Kelliher said. "You want the business and we want to get the airplane sales to them, but there's the real concern of giving away so much technology that they start building their own."

That's what happened to Western and Japanese automakers, which made inroads in the Chinese market only to see their designs copied and technologies stolen. Already, China's vehicle manufacturers are venturing overseas, exporting 325,000 units last year — mostly low-priced trucks and buses to Asia, Africa and Latin America.

"We're taking a bigger piece of the pie," said Yamilet Guevara, a sales manager for Cinascar Automotriz, which has opened 20 showrooms in Venezuela in the past 18 months, offering cars from six Chinese makers. "They ask by name now. It's no longer just the Chinese car. It's the Tiggo, the QQ."

China's biggest car company, Chery Automobile Co., just announced a deal with the Chrysler Group to jointly produce and export cars to Western Europe and the United States within 2 1/2 years.

Given the speed of China's ascent, it's perhaps not surprising that China itself is trying to calm some of the fears. Its slogan for the Beijing Olympics: "Peacefully Rising China."

This blogger suggests that anybody whom feels that China's rise is a bad thing should start shopping American (or whatever). After all, if you don't like it you should stop finding it? ACB is certain that America "can" live without $US49.99 DVD players and $US9.99 shirts. ACB is also certain that most American's wouldn't want to, though.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Diego left...
Monday, 3 September 2007 3:16 am

This really sucks. And I suck by saying this, but I hope there's a war with China soon. For the Taiwan issue. That would stop this dictatorship. I just hate they benefit, while they keep their dirty hands over Uyghurs and Tibetans.


2. ACB left...
Monday, 3 September 2007 4:44 am

Unless you want to see the destruction of America as a super power, that's a really silly thing to say.

A war with China would destroy the world economy, with America being the very first victim. Not only is China the majority supplier of consumer goods to America (Wal-Mart would go under in half a year without cheap Chinese electronics, clothes and home-wares), but many many American companies have invested in China and the uncertainty over these investments that a war would bring would annihilate the stock market.

Equally, China is a massive holder of dollars and a massive investor in US treasury debt. In the even of a war China could simply sell the its dollars and dollar debts which would devalue the dollar making imported goods such as OIL a great many times more expensive.

In no time Americans would be living in a world where nobody could buy a Chinese DVD player because China wasn't selling, where nobody could afford to buy one from anywhere else because it would be $100+ to the Yen rather than the other way round, and where it would cost more to fill up an SUV with gas than to buy one.

Also, think of the cost of a war with China, both in manpower and dollars. (That's your tax and your children, by the way).

Forget Allies. Japan can't interfere in a US-China war unless China attacks it (Japan's constitution expressly forbids it from doing so). The EU needs Chinese goods, Russia would not support the US for many reasons, with one of the big ones being because it would like to see it fail, and another one being because it doesn't want the US to have any more power in Asia than it already does (Russian gas will also help to ensure that Europe won't support a Sino-US war. As in, Russia would threaten to cut it off if the EU supported the US). Africa is on China's side now because of Chinese investment, and the Middle East wouldn't support the US either, partly because they hate it already.

As for firepower. Sure, America has a lot but it does not have sufficient conventional weapons to take on China. It would have to work from ships, carriers and small islands because of the distance issues. This would liit the firepower that it can bring to bear (China is much bigger than Iraq, and to take Iraq the US had to use land bases as well as ships).

American pilots would be fatigued from flying and living on ship, and would have only moderate moral as they would be fighting a non-survival war. Chinese pilots would be fresh, would have ground defenses and radar to back them up and would be fighting like wounded tigers to defend their homes.

Imagine a couple of hundred Chinese pilots racing toward you in SU-27 and 33, all believing that you want to murder their children and brutalize their wives, while you are fighting over a piece of land that you can't even find on a map, populated by people who care more about your money than your way of life. Sure you can kill a lot of Chinese, but they will keep coming as Chinese factories churn out more and more aircraft and conscript ever man of fighting age from a population of 1.3 billion. It would only take a single missile to get through and they could wipe out an American carrier worth more than the GDP of a small country, and kill a thousand men. I doubt very much that a Us administration could stomach that.

Then, worst case, China has nukes, and America doesn't yet have a missile defense screen effective enough to block them all.

Worse still, if America looked weak or unable to crush China, it might provoke other nations to rise up too, and it might provike the millions of ethnic Chinese in the US. You think that it's bad fearing Arab terrorist, now imagine what it would be like if every Chinatown in the US became a potential terrorist recruitment ground. What's more I doubt that there's a single nuclear power station in the US without an ethnic Chinese in a strategic location. Sure, they might all be patriots to the US, but can you take that risk?

Sure, I want freedom for Tibet and so on, but a war with China would be a disaster for the US.


3. Andreas left...
Sunday, 9 September 2007 7:49 am

9.99 for a shirt is a bit steep...


4. ACB left...
Sunday, 9 September 2007 4:20 pm

That's a work shirt, not a t-shirt.


5. Beamish left...
Friday, 28 September 2007 10:23 pm

I agree with ACB, that wasn't the best thing to say, we're living in a world were many countries are interconnected, if one goes down they all fall down, China has it's hands in so many jars it would be a disastor if the USA and China went to war, money that would be put into defending China would have to come from somewhere, so there goes all those aid plans out the window, China is a really vital part of the economy and rapidly become more vital every minute. I can see how you feel a little sore about it however, as the Tibetan issue is terrible, but why do you have to immediately jump to war? Why not try nagotiation first? Also, the line about growing pains is more than true, china is a very hungry boy, soon the worlds resources will be spread a bit thin.