Angry Chinese Blogger

Angry Chinese Blogger: The news and views about China that the big media can't, or won't, tell you

The is no single truth

Menu
:
Home

The Memoirs of Zhao Ziyang: Topping China's prohibited books list?

posted Sunday, 17 May 2009

Although ACB has a been and great love for the Chinese motherland, there are a great many things about it that make ACB both angry and sad at the same time, and one of the things the effects ACB the most is Beijing's continuing attitude towards the atrocities committed at Tiananmen Square in 1989.

It is not just that the atrocities happened, or that so many hopes and dreams were crushed on that day, or even that so many lives were lost, it is that even after all of this time Beijing still refuses to address the issue in a correct manner.

Even 20 years after those great and terrible days, when hopes rose and were then so cruley ground into the dirt, Beijing refuses to account for its actions, and refuses to allow any views be heard other than its own pathetic cry that the past should be burried for the sake of future stability: which is a cruel deciet in itself in itself.

Those who wish to search for the truth find nothing but locked doors in front of them and secret policemen behind them. Those who wish to discuss what happened are warned off, imprisoned, or otherwise censored. And those who wish to tell their own stories are victimized by a cold and heartless state that is more concerned about its own survival than about the Chinese people.

It is for these reasons that ACB was heartened to learn that of the publication of "Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao Ziyang", the memoirs of the late senior Chinese leader Zhao Ziyang, whom was deposed for refusing to take a hard line with Chinese protesters at Tiananmen and other sites around the country. The memoirs are based on approximately 30 hours of spoken word recordings made by Zhao prior to his death. and provide a side of the story that is rarely heard from a man who was both a victim of the events surrounding the massacre, and a key player in them.

In an unusual move, ACB is not going to blog directly about this topic, or to cut and paste in a story wholesale from elsewhere, but is instead going to direct readers over to the pages of Time Magazine where the story may be read in full in much more eloquent English that ACB can muster. Please adjourn to http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1898042-2,00.html for further reading.

In the book, Zhao, who died in 2005, details the drama and conflict behind the scenes during the Tiananmen protests. The priority of the party's leaders ultimately wasn't to suppress a rebellion but to settle a power struggle between conservative and liberal factions. China's hard-liners had tried for years to derail the economic and political innovations that Zhao had introduced; Tiananmen, Zhao demonstrates in his journal, gave the conservatives a pretext to set the clock back. The key moment in Zhao's narrative is a meeting held at Deng Xiaoping's home on May 17, 1989, less than three weeks before the Tiananmen massacre. Zhao argued that the government should back off from its harsh threats against the protesters and look for ways to ease tensions. Two conservative officials immediately stood up to criticize Zhao, effectively blaming the escalating protests on him. Deng had the last word with his fateful decision to impose martial law and move troops into the capital. In a rare historical instance of a split at the party's highest levels, Zhao wouldn't sign on: "I refused to become the General Secretary who mobilized the military to crack down on students."

The Secret Memoir of a Fallen Chinese Leader, Adi Ignatius, Time Magazine (May 2009).

Prisoner of the State is not going to make the Mainland best sellers list. In fact any publisher who dares to print a copy is likely to find their business 'significantly disrupted' in future. Also, do not expect to see Mainland reviews of this prohibited book or even discussions on the Mainland about why it is has been prohibited because as every China watcher knows, when a book is prohibited discussion of the book is also prohibited, as is discussion on why the discussion of prohibited books is also prohibited. And so on.

However, do expect to see pirate copies being passed around in select cireles, as well as texts published in Hong Kong and Chiense Taiwan.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Spelunker left...
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 3:40 am :: http://danwei.ning.com/profile/Spelunker

I'm a big fan of Zhao Ziyang and this is my first time to visit your blog. I like your blog's subtitle (news and views China's big media won't tell you) and I am interested in your thoughts regarding the Tumen River border incident in March 2009. Do you believe the American journalists (Euna Lee, Laura Ling, and Mitch Koss) were led across the border by an ethnic Korean China citizen who tricked them while posing as their guide? I think the North Korean sentries could not have caught them otherwise. Why have we not heard anything from Mitch Koss? Why have we not heard anything from the guide? Koss has returned to America but US media doesn't put a microphone in front of his face. The Jilin province guide who was involved in the incident has not been heard from either. I think the Chinese are hiding the truth about what happened. Can you share your thoughts about this incident?


2. AC left...
Friday, 22 May 2009 4:41 am

I liked reading this - you ought to think about contacting people over at Asia Chronicle, a new Asia news daily, about possibly getting some of your work to a wider audience. They always look for news with a global outlook written by those with experience in Asia. The website for them is www.asiachronicle.com.


3. ron753 left...
Monday, 7 September 2009 12:32 am

I have read this highly revealing book, and I feel that Zhao Ziyang was badly treated, but at least he stayed alive, although under house arrest until his death. I hope that one day his real achievements will be recognized in China. At the moment 'the old guard' are still too fightened of dissent to allow the subject to be discussed.